Navigation key

The Article Archives
Topic: COMMENTARIES by S. Michael Craven

Hope for a Christian Renaissance?

May 5, 2008
S. Michael Craven
tweet this  share this on facebook  



Two years ago I wrote that we may be seeing the first signs of what could be a new cultural renaissance in Italy. In March 2006, the Catholic News Agency reported that “a significant number of Italian lawmakers, politicians and intellectuals, led by the president of the Italian Senate, Marcello Pera and including such individuals as Italy’s Culture Minister, Rocco Buttiglione, presented a manifesto in which they attribute the confusion and fear in Europe over Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism to ‘a moral and spiritual crisis’ that prevents the continent from finding ‘the courage to react.’”

The article went on to say that “the manifesto, endorsed by more than 70 different leaders in government, trade unions and universities, states that the West is ‘under attack from the outside by Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism’ and is ‘incapable of responding to the challenge.’”  

The authors of the manifesto argued that “Europe is sick.” They pointed out that “the birth rate continues to fall, as well as [Europe’s] competitiveness, unity and action on the world scene.  It hides and denies its own identity and thus fails to provide itself a legitimate constitution of its citizens.”

The document also argued for the “better integration of immigrants” (In other words, assimilation into Western culture) and defends the right to life “from conception to natural death.” Additionally, these leaders affirmed that the natural family is the foundation of society, and marriage and argued that it “must be protected and differentiated from any other type of union or bond.” Ultimately, these leaders acknowledged that continued commitment to radical secularism, moral ambiguity, and postmodern tolerance will form the basis of Europe’s ultimate demise.

Apparently, this anti-secular, conservative momentum has continued to build in the two years since. This past month, voters in Italy overwhelmingly re-elected pro-life conservative former Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi. The LA Times reported that “the margin of Berlusconi's victory, in which he and his allies gained indisputable control of both houses of parliament, also suggested a stinging condemnation of the left…”

Already, Berlusconi’s administration has proposed new laws restricting abortion, an issue which featured prominently in the election. Berlusconi has also called on the United Nations to approve a worldwide moratorium on abortions. Acknowledging this pro-life trend, Chuck Colson’s Breakpoint recently reported on Italy’s Giuliano Ferrara, a former Communist who now edits a conservative newspaper called Il Foglio, “the Sheet.” Colson writes, “Ferrara used his paper and talk show to advocate a moratorium on abortion and ‘to call attention to the value of life.’”

Colson adds, “This is not the first time Ferrara has bucked conventional secular wisdom. His paper has also supported the Catholic Church on matters like bioethics, relativism, and the decline of the Christian faith among Italians—this despite the fact that Ferrara is an atheist. While Ferrara insists that he is a ‘nonbeliever,’ other Italian politicians, as Britain’s New Statesman put it, ‘have been eagerly declaring their Christian credentials.’”

Colson continues, “According to the publication, this eagerness is a response to what it calls the ‘crucial change’ in Italian life since 2001: ‘the collapse of every grand political idea.’”

This “crucial change” began with a small group of cultural leaders who rose to oppose Italy’s cultural and spiritual decline, which is precisely the point I made two years ago. This has always been the impetus for long-term cultural change. Throughout history it has been small groups within societies that have initiated and produced real cultural change.

Pitirim Sorokin, the noted Harvard sociologist, observed in his study of social history that within hedonistic cultures a “temperate and creative minority” can arise. As a result of the “creative minority’s” commitment to virtue and chastity there naturally follows an increase in their creative output that affects various spheres of culture such as “religion, non-materialistic philosophy, non-hedonistic and non-sensual ethics, and the fine arts.”

In other words, a competent moral minority can, in fact, produce sustainable cultural change. For example, prior to the Italian Renaissance (14th-15th centuries) there was a steady decline of sexual morality, marriage and family beginning in the thirteenth century. Nonetheless there remained a small but “virtuous” class of intellectual elites whose creative productivity increased while the surrounding culture declined. These cultural shapers ultimately laid the foundations for another minority of intellectual elites that would initiate the Protestant Reformation followed by the Catholic Counter-Reformation. This produced the intellectual, scientific, political and economic revolutions that established the preeminence of Western cultural achievement.     

In every instance, positive cultural progress and, in some cases, reversal of cultural decline was produced by a small minority who had the insight, wherewithal, and courage to act in contradiction to the cultural drift toward immorality and the resulting creative stupor. This point was strongly reinforced by Randall Collins, The Dorothy Swaine Thomas Professor in Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. Collins argues in his book, The Sociology of Philosophies that over the course of 3,000 years of history only about 500 thinkers have been at the center of world civilization.

Many of these were men and women of faith who, choosing to live in obedience to God, resisted the values of their culture while pressing the truth of Christ into every area of life and culture. These Christians were counter-cultural in virtually every way as well as intellectually competent in their respective spheres of influence. These two must go hand in hand in order to impact culture. In doing this they were able to establish a Christian cultural consensus that shaped Western culture for centuries.
 
In conclusion, Christians, competent in their faith and possessing a comprehensive biblical view of life and reality, must rise to challenge the cultural trends toward secularism, moral ambiguity, and the stupefaction of culture. We, once again, must become cultural leaders capable of exercising the tools of reason and persuasion, not political coercion, if there be any hope of reversing the deleterious effects currently unfolding in American culture.

© 2008 by S. Michael Craven

Back to Top

Responses
Response from : Jai Wynne  

May 5, 2008 8:55 AM
 

I'm not sure there's any hope for Europe to pull out of the moral slide they've been in for quite some time.It's encouraging to see several leaders take a stand, but the people have been conditioned to the absense of religion and restraint to the point they have a hard time recognizing what is beneficial for their social and spiritual well being. Scripture refers to those who have been allowed to go there own way and left to their own devices. I hope America wakes up before we end up in the same sorry state that Europe is in--we're not too far behind now and will be even less so if a liberal is elected to the office of President this November.


 
Response from : Gina  

May 5, 2008 9:34 AM
 

This was a most inspiring article. Thank you so much for providing it for us. I also appreciate the fact that you speak to your readers in an intelligent, reasonable way, firm in your conviction and provide support for your argument. This assists me as I reach out to others around me. Thank you again, and God bless!


 
Response from : Sherwood MacRae  

May 5, 2008 9:41 AM
 

Michael, I love your commentaries even though I am not always in agreement with you.

What troubles me about this issue is my feeling that most Christians - trying to impact our culture, come off insisting that it is only the Christian "way" that has merit and most are primarily interested in fostering their denominational interpretation of the scriptures. Thus, before we begin, we are hopelessly bound to debate among ourselves - rather than influencing the outsiders.

I - for one, am not impressed with "our" past performances as we seem to fail in our acknowledgement of what Calvary was meant to be. We do not appear to grasp the significance of repentance from dead works and the importantace of forgiveness as a way of life.

I would like to hear more about the "needs" of the converted person to reflect the teachings of Christ.

Sherwood MacRae
Cookeville, TN


 
Response from : John H. Armstrong  

May 5, 2008 10:51 AM
 

This is superb Michael. This is how culture really changes and American Christians could take some real lessons from this. What we desperately need is a clear-eyed minority of real Christians not a "moral majority" or anything like it. Thanks for making this story known more widely. Bravo!

http://www.johnharmstrong.com

 
Response from : Don  

May 5, 2008 2:00 PM
 

Hear! Hear! Thanks for a concise summary and call to action. And thanks for a reminder of hope.

http://thepaceline.blogspot.com/

 
Response from : Steve Nienhiser  

May 9, 2008 3:23 PM
 

I agree we need revival and it will most likely happen through "Christians, competent in their faith and possessing a comprehensive biblical view of life and reality". This message must begin within the church and specifically be delivered from the church pulpits. Where do we find men who are being trained to lead a church and preach this message every Sunday? Seriously, are there any seminaries with this goal in mind? Is the church willing to hear this message or will it go on in its worldly ways seeking pride, pleasure, and power for itself continually robbing God of His honor and bringing shame to the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Can the current churches be reformed, or are we starting over? God knows. Thank you for your commentaries, they are both enlightening and encouraging, and fitly spoken for the issues of our day.


 
Response from : Jean Terry  

October 31, 2009 1:16 PM
 

In seeing the decline of
morals and values in the us this is optimistic and hopeful.


 

Return to topics Return to articles
Back to Top

Respond to This Article

Form Authentication: 

Refresh the page if  
image does not appear  

Please enter the form validation code
you see displayed above.



Your Information:
You must include your full name. Submissions that do not include both first and last names will not be posted.

Name:

 

Email Address:

URL:

Respond to This Article:

Your comments will be reviewed and either approved or denied publication.

 

Back to Top

Navigation Key

 Return to topics
 Return to articles 
 Read article with responses 
 Respond to this article