|
Consumerism: Christians In and Of the World

October 27, 2005

While there may be
some who do not conform entirely to the pressures of modernity and
postmodernism there are few in
who escape the influence and subsequent captivity of consumerism. Consumerism
is a ubiquitous and persistent force working in American culture that is
undermining individuals, disintegrating families and communities, and sapping
the Church of its influence and witness.
Consumerism is so
much more than mere materialism. Consumerism is an ideology of which
materialism is merely a component; it is a way of thinking that has
surreptitiously become the principle basis for how many Americans perceive life
and view themselves. An ambiguous social and economic phenomenon, consumerism
derives from the “systematic creation and encouragement of the desire[1]
Richard John Neuhaus clarifies consumerism as “living in a manner that is
measured by having rather than being.”[2] In
other words, consumerism shifts the object of human life from achieving
personhood measured by the character of one’s being to achieving personhood
measured by the nature of one’s possessions, appearance and social status. Ironically,
the fatal flaw in communism was that it reduced persons to mere factors of
production and in so doing undermined the human person’s creativity and ability
to give to others. In much the same way, consumerism reduces persons to mere
objects of consumption. Consumerism could be further understood as, responding
to the suggestive messages that those experiences which were once reserved for
the privileged classes, the educated elite and the truly accomplished can all
be yours without effort, on the
purchase of the appropriate commodity.[3]
The net result is the creation in our minds of an idealized “lifestyle”
matching those suggestive messages. It is this idealized and artificial
lifestyle that is then pursued as the principle means to achieving life
satisfaction, happiness, and contentment or the so-called “good life.” For the
consumerist, all of their creative and intellectual energy is redirected toward
this goal: a goal which is, in essence, an illusion created largely by the
commercial interests of corporate and the entertainment
industry.
to possess material goods and
personal success in ever greater amounts.”
According to the
devotees of consumerism, one of the ways the “good life” can be achieved is
through the endless improvement of one’s self-image. While there is nothing
wrong with a healthy self-image there is something inherently destructive about
an image of one’s self that is rooted solely in physical appearance, social
status, or material success. In such a system, human persons are in essence
reduced to objects whose value is again determined more by “having” than that
of “being.” The explosive growth of cosmetic surgery in this country could be
largely attributed to the influence of consumerism with its inherent emphasis
on perfecting the external image in order to meet the idealized lifestyle
represented by Madison Avenue and ,
the two biggest expositors of consumerist ideology.
The late John Paul
II regarded consumerism as “a threat to the freedom of the human person to live
according to the higher demands of love rather than to the lower pull of
material desires.”[4] How
true. Don’t we, especially in America, often find ourselves driven more by the
pursuit of our own material desires; a sort of “dog eat dog” mentality, instead
of driven by concern for the well-being of our fellow man?
Christian theology
clearly teaches that it is not the possession of material goods alone, or even
the desire for a better life that is sinful. Rather it is possessing, including
the desire to possess, without regard
for the appropriate hierarchy of the material possessions and resources one has
and the subordination of those goods to their proper place. Material goods and
resources, according to Scripture, should remain subservient to man and
available to support his service to the Kingdom and his neighbor. Also it would
be a mistake to assume that consumerism is the exclusive sin of the rich.
Consumerism crosses all socio-economic classes by promoting perpetual
discontentment among the “haves” and envy among the “have nots.”
Consumerism also
posits that this “good life” can be achieved through increased financial
security. The consumerist believes that financial security is the only real
foundation that produces freedom to enjoy life, contentment, and life
stability. I would add that the consumerist tends to define “financial
security” in very different terms. To the consumerist, financial security is
achieved when they posses the financial resources to acquire all of the
commodities necessary to the idealized lifestyle. This contradicts the virtues
of thrift and prudence which achieve financial security from having something
to fall back on during economic hardship. Quite often, the preeminence of
security through material acquisition leads to a validation of every decision
that places career choices above everything else. For example, we do not
hesitate to relocate our families for the “right opportunity” often leaving
extended family behind depriving our children of the important
multi-generational influence. We are the most transient society on earth. We
are consumerist nomads in continual search of greener pastures and this nomadic
condition works to dis-integrate
families and communities by severing familial and community roots. Children
raised in isolation from their extended families tend to lose an important
sense of connection to their past as well as to a family heritage that is
larger than one’s self. Grandparents, for example, serve as active participants
in the family’s social construction of its history, which connects us to past
generations thus promoting a sense of belonging or even this “connectedness”
that I spoke of in the previous chapter. The sense of belonging to something
larger than just ourselves also promotes consideration of other people; it
conditions us for community. The absence of these ongoing familial influences
contributes to the radical individualism characteristic of American culture and
serves to isolate us from our families and neighbors. We seem to be a people
who are always on our way to somewhere else,
never content with where we are. This is evidenced by the fact that the average
length of home ownership in
is approximately six years, by far the shortest duration in the world.
Another area
affected by the pursuit of financial security as life’s panacea is that the
barrier which once insulated family time from employment demands is eliminated.
We no longer hesitate to travel on Sundays, for example, in order to make that
Monday morning meeting or work weekends and evenings. American workers are
working more hours than ever before and the growing expectation among employers
is: “If you want to get ahead you’ll do what needs to be done otherwise you
lack commitment and your career here is over.” According to a study by the Economic Policy Institute, “the average
hours worked by all family members is
up 11 percent since 1975”[5]
and according the Bureau of Labor, “32.8 percent of all full-time employees
worked on weekends and holidays.”[6][7]
Americans talk of family values but evidently we no longer value family
especially if the priority of commitment to family requires financial sacrifice
and career concessions. The shield which once existed between the demands of
the marketplace and the obligations of family has been obliterated and the
marketplace now reigns supreme. Therefore if family and marketplace come into
conflict the family must give way and the consumerist father rationalizes that it
is ultimately for the good of the family because the highest possible
contribution, he believes, of paternal parenting is economic improvement and
financial stability.
The American Journal of Sociology states that “since 1969 the time American
parents spend with their children has declined by 22 hours per week”!
Americans suffer
spiritually and emotionally as well. Given the extraordinary time and schedule
pressures enlisted by families today, as well as misplaced priorities, there is
less time for involvement in the community of believers. Weekly church
attendance has reached an all time low in In
addition, many people who find themselves slaves to consumerism have come to
realize that despite achieving the consumerist-created lifestyle it has failed
to produce the promised benefits. These discontent consumerists will then often
go to "religion" in search of meaning and purpose. Unfortunately,
many are only looking to give their “lifestyle” meaning and purpose and they
think that by integrating “a little Jesus” into their lives they will then
balance and perfect the lifestyle. Tragically they do not realize; it is not
their lifestyle that is in need of salvation it is their eternal souls.
In the case of
religious consumerists, they tend to respond to the forces of consumerism
through increased efforts to integrate the spiritual disciplines; scheduled
prayer or “quiet time,” regular Bible study, etc. In other words, they approach
God in the same that they approach work, as a task to be fulfilled with
measurable goals to be achieved. Spiritual discipline is essential to the life
of every believer however in the case of the consumerist; spiritual activity
can become one more “thing” on their to-do list. The emphasis on spirituality
as another discipline can also become a form of spiritual works in which one
seeks to satisfy their obligations to God through religious activity. Rather than adding religious activities to
our lives as one among many priorities; we need to learn to discipline our
appetites and desires and learn to be content with what we have and where we
are in life. Jesus Christ is not to be treated as one good among many; Jesus
Christ is the supreme Good and the source and summit of all life!
With the increased
priority given to the marketplace, there follows a decreased commitment to
neighbors, community and connections to extended family, children are displaced
in pursuit of “opportunities,” and familial priorities become subverted to
company demands. What is perhaps most disturbing is that too many Christians
are compliant in this subversion of family to work by either their
unquestioning participation as employees or the imposition of these same values
as employers.
Reflecting upon
the post-Christian landscape of the late 20th century, Christian
philosopher Francis Schaeffer speculated that after the “death of God” and the
resulting loss of absolute truth and moral values, modern society would be left
with only the two terrible values of “personal peace and personal prosperity.”
Schaeffer went on to say that once these values became accepted; Americans
would sacrifice everything to protect their personal peace and affluence
including their children and their grandchildren.[9] When
this artificial “lifestyle” becomes the object and aim of life the consumerist,
quite naturally, seeks to preserve it all costs because in their minds; it is
life.
Furthermore,
consumerism shifts the objective of human life away from cultivating virtue and
character, knowing truth and being content to this artificially constructed and
idealized “lifestyle” that is continually reinforced through media,
entertainment, and advertising. Again, “things” take priority over persons and
“having” supersedes being and in so doing we become a superficial culture
filled with distractions that inhibit introspective thought and meaningful
relationships.
In commenting on
the lack of introspection of men that inhibits meaningful reflection of life’s
most important questions, Blaise Pascal, the 17th century
mathematician and Christian apologist, speaking as such a man, wrote: “As I
know not whence I come, neither do I know whither I am bound; all I know is that
when I quit this world, I shall fall forever either into nothingness or into
the hands of an angry God, without knowing which of these two states is to be
for ever my lot. …I must after all pass my whole life without a thought of
enquiring into the issue.”[10]
Pascal adds that, “nothing is so unbearable to man as to be at a standstill,
without passion, business, amusement, occupation. ‘Tis then he feels his
nothingness, his foolishness, his insufficiency, his dependence, his
dependence.”[11] Pascal rightly observes that the only good
thing for such men, therefore, is to be so diverted by business, sport, and
amusement that they stop thinking about their circumstances. This is why we so
readily embrace the distractions of consumerism. Consumerism presents us with a
pleasant illusion that conceals the cosmic truth of man’s rebellion [sin] and
subsequent alienation from God; the effects of which have infected every aspect
of life and reality.
Indeed, we live in
a world full of distractions especially when one considers that the typical American
is bombarded with an average of 3,000 product ads per day. Almost all of which
present this idealized lifestyle in its varied forms with the key to its easy
acquisition being; buy this commodity! However, it not necessary to buy or even
want what is offered; it is the constant barrage of images depicting the
perfect life that if viewed uncritically can inculcate the consumerist vision.
Barry Schwartz, a psychologist at
argues that,
“American life is flooded with too many choices. …The result is a society of
stressed out and unsatisfied customers.”[12]
Of course this dissatisfaction is rooted in the misguided pursuit of consumer
goods, which by virtue of “planned obsolescence” are designed to no longer
satisfy at some point in the future. Dr.
David G. Myers reported in American
Psychologist that “Compared with their grandparents, today's young adults
have grown up with much more affluence, slightly less happiness and much greater
risk of depression and assorted social pathology. …“Our becoming much better
off over the last four decades has not been accompanied by one iota of
increased subjective well-being.”[13]
One writer points
out that, “consumerism creates and nourishes human desire for temporal goods
and for the sense of well-being that the acquisition and possession of those
goods can provide.”[14]
Consumerism conditions us never to be satisfied with sufficiency but to “be all
that we can be through the endless development of talent and productivity.”[15]
Thus, we remain perpetually discontent, unable to rest in that which is “good”
but always wanting more. Perhaps the strongest expression of this among
Christians is the idea that to be content with sufficiency is to somehow “settle
for less” which we condemn as lazy, defeatist, and even irresponsible. Some
will vigorously defend their devotion to success in this sense as “doing all
things to the glory of God” or in the name of God-honoring excellence. However,
they are likely more often driven more by the consumerist imposed belief that
if you just work hard enough then all will be yours and they must not stop
until they have it all!
There is no
question that Christianity teaches strong personal responsibility and the idea
of doing our very best in everything that we do, however, this does not exclude
our responsibilities as husbands, wives and parents either. Nor does this
preclude our responsibilities as “prophets, priests and kings” in the world.
Interestingly, those who argue this line of thinking seem to always limit their
efforts for excellence to the marketplace where consumer goods, social status
and image improvement remains the focus. The religious consumerist does not
generally apply this same energy and vigor in self-sacrificing service of God
or their fellow man.
The consumerist is
always telling himself that if he just works harder he will able to make time
for family, leisure and himself later. The religious consumerist is convinced
that by working harder now he will be able to “make time for God” later but
fears that any “slacking off” of his manic pace is a failure to “use God’s
gifts.” Again, God becomes one more item on his “to-do” list. In doing this,
God, spiritual growth and discipleship remain collateral categories in the
consumerist life and rarely rise to become what they should be: the
all-encompassing focus of human life. In an essay on Christian asceticism,
Timothy Vaverek, a Catholic priest writes that, “love of God has come to mean
giving thanks for His gifts by maximizing productive ‘self-actualization’ while
love of neighbor has come to mean providing them with consumer goods.”[16]
Contrary to the consumerist adage that says we need to “be all that we can be;”
we simply need to be what God wants us to be.
One result of
consumerism is nation of people overwhelmed by the tyranny of the urgent,
watching in disbelief as one week goes into the next then one month, then two,
then three until years have passed and that promised lifestyle still eludes
them. In the end they are left with the realization that their life amounts to
nothing more than work; they have drifted apart in their relationships; their
children are grown and gone, and they have waited for that elusive goal of "everything accomplished" so they
could start “enjoying life” only to realize that life has already passed them
by. In living this way we are living less than we were designed to and our
focus remains in all the wrong areas. For the Christian consumerist their lives
are little different from the world and this lack of “counter-cultural” living
validates the unbelieving world’s rejection of the Gospel. Unbelievers observe
that, “Christians don’t live any different than I do so how can this Jesus be
real if He doesn’t make any difference in their lives?” As Christians we are to
resist worldliness and completely reorient our goals, priorities, and thinking.
In essence, our lives should look different. Christians should serve to
humanize society by demonstrating love and bringing hope to a fallen world.
They should not be participating in the dehumanization that results from
reducing people to objects of consumption that is fostered by consumerist
thinking and living.
It is possibly
this uniquely American phenomenon that may be contributing to so much
resentment around the world. I say uniquely American phenomenon because
consumerism is a much greater problem here than anywhere else in the West. That
is not to say that Europeans are disaffected by consumerism, they aren’t,
however, they tend to have some natural defenses that mitigate against its
effects. The fact that the European counties are much more homogenous
contributes to their sense of national identity and fosters a greater sense of
community. This, in turn, preserves their commitment to familial connections
and their sense of family heritage. Europeans, in general, tend to be very
family centric and more balanced in their approach to work and play. While
Europeans have numerous problems resulting from radical secularization; family dissolution,
increased work hours, and manic lifestyles are not among them to the same
extent as here in .
America used to export missionaries
in unparalleled number and fortunately still do to a large extent but more and
more we are exporting consumerist ideology; an ideology that is ultimately at
odds with Christianity. My missionary friends tell me that this paradox of
American ideological export only adds to their challenges. In the wake of “globalization,” American corporations now
see the world only in terms of potential markets and consumers. More and more
we are telling impoverished peoples in third world countries that they too can
have a better life through the acquisition of the right soft drinks, clothing
and sneakers. This is powerfully reinforced through the export of Hollywood
films which, according to Michael Medved, now receive more than 70 percent of
their revenue from countries outside the U.S.[17]
The message of consumerism coupled with the sexualized messages all too common
to Hollywood doesn’t make for the best representation of American ideals.
We have already
demonstrated our willingness to separate trade policy from human rights policy
in order to gain potential market opportunities as in the case of .
This might be one reason why more and more nations consider us so hypocritical
– we think we’re “good” and everyone should have what we have however, when we
turn a blind eye to human suffering and oppression because we are more
concerned about economic opportunities; we surrender the moral high ground.
Again, "things" rise above people and compassion is subverted by
profit. If American Christians want the world to take seriously the claims of
Christ then we must work to advance policies, both foreign and domestic, that
prioritize people and moral good over economic desires. This applies to both
governmental policies as well as the individual and corporate practices of the
Church. Specifically regarding the Church, Evangelicals remain the most
generous in terms of charitable giving in however those numbers have
nonetheless been declining.[18]
Furthermore, only eight percent of professing Christians indicate that they
give ten percent of their income in the form of a tithe to their church.[19][20]
Blessed are the poor indeed!
What is perhaps most revealing related to the priorities given to money within
the Body of Christ in
was the fact that those making the least amount of money gave more to the
church as a percentage than those with higher incomes. The disparity is
significant. Among those making less than $20,000 annually, eight percent
tithed a full ten percent of their income while only one percent of those
making $75,000 - $99,999 gave the ten percent tithe.
The point I am
making is not an argument for tithing but rather that our tithing patterns
demonstrate the priority that we have given to our money which is often
allocated to our lifestyle in the form of consumer debt before it is
consecrated to God much less to helping others. The fact is our lifestyles are
often such that we have borrowed what we have not earned to buy what we cannot
afford and thus we live enslaved to our creditors. Because we have prioritized
the consumerist vision as the aim and object of our lives we simply don’t have
anything left over to give to God and others.
I hasten to add
that I do not write this as one who is above and therefore immune to the pull
of consumerism. Quite the contrary, as a former corporate CEO I confess that I
too was once very much in the grip of consumerist thinking. I bought into this
seduction even to the point of treating my relationship with Christ as a mere
“component” of my life. I too, was diligent in my “Christian walk” however to
be completely honest I have to confess that my expectation was, that Christ would
“come alongside my life plans and my objectives and ‘bless’
them.” In other words, I was seeking divine blessing of my consumerist
lifestyle. It was not until I realized, by His grace, that Jesus Christ did not
come to be a mere “component” of my life but its all-encompassing purpose and Lord. Christ calls us to
subordinate our lives, our goals, and our plans to His Lordship and be willing
to accept His will no matter what may come. How often are our prayers related
to our material needs versus our character needs? Certainly we are to ask the
Lord for our “daily bread” but the priority should be our conformation to the
image of Christ; “who being in very nature God, did not consider equality with
God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing…he humbled himself and
became obedient to death – even death on a cross!”[21] Consumerism by its very nature opposes this
same self-emptying humility to which all Christians are called. I believe the
first step toward breaking free from the grip of consumerism begins with simple
recognition that it is in fact a tangible philosophy that pervades our culture.
Following this recognition we must begin to think critically in response to the
many forms and messages of consumerism learning to filter these through the biblical
understanding of life and its relationship to material goods. This recognition
alone will serve to undermine the power and influence that the messages of
consumerism put forth.
I am not naïve
regarding the enormous challenges associated with breaking out of the grip of
consumerism; for me it has taken time along with numerous practical and
sometimes difficult steps to simplify my life. We need to discover that our
satisfaction and being are to be found entirely in Christ. Practically, for me
and my family, this involved downsizing homes and cars, generally reducing all
of our expenses, eliminating all consumer debt, credit cards, ridding my home
of cable television (a major distraction from meaningful things), and carefully
guarding mine and my family’s time.
The bottom line is
that we must be willing to embrace a form of Christian asceticism or simplicity
in life. Before you panic, I am not speaking in the same degree as a 12th
century monk but rather the pursuit of simplicity in as much of our lives as
possible. This includes how and on what we spend our money, our time, and our
energy. We must seek to orient our priorities toward growing in the knowledge
of and devotion to God; being content with financial sufficiency and no longer
always yearning for more and borrowing to buy what we have not earned. We
should prioritize devotion to our spouses; the nurture and training of our
children in the admonition of the Lord. Finally we must abandon the
construction of self that is rooted in the thoughts of others and instead find
establish our “self” in the imitation of Christ and His character.
The Christian life
compels us to respond to God’s love by imitating the self-emptying love of
Christ daily. Timothy Vaverek prescribes a three-fold Christian response to the
lure of consumerism which summarizes a sound biblical approach: “Through
self-denial the Christian turns away from the inessential desires of his will
and his flesh, being content with God’s will for his life. Through prayer he
seeks deeper communion with God and the grace to persevere in the narrow path
of self-sacrificial love. Through works of mercy and charity the Christian not
only shares material goods with others, he pours himself out on their behalf.”[22]
It is only when we, Christians, abandon the lure of the world so often
presented by the consumerist message with its empty promises and unreservedly
commit ourselves to the higher call of Christ that the world will see the glory
of God in and through his church.
G.K. Chesterton once observed, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and
found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.”[23]
In the case of consumerism the Christian ideal is indeed difficult especially
when the whole current of our age combines to press us in the never-ending
quest to desire, acquire, and accomplish. In the consumerist culture it is
difficult to “be still and know that He is God.”
© S. Michael Craven, 2006
[1] Timothy
V. Vaverek,
Catholic Worker, Vol. 21, No. 1, January 2001
[2] Richard
John Neuhaus, Doing Well and Doing Good:
The Challenge to the Christian Capitalist (New York: Doubleday 1992).
[3] This
definition was derived from Lasch’s description of consumerism. Christopher
Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism:
American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations, (:
W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1979), p. 152
[4] Raymond
J. de Souza, John Paul II and the Problem
of Consumerism, Acton Institute, www.acton.org/publicat/randl/article.php?id=321,
(accessed February 17, 2006)
[5] Economic Snapshots, Economic Policy Institute, Snapshot for July 7, 2004,
www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snapshots_07072004, (accessed February
20, 2006)
[6]
Bureau of
Labor and Statistics, Table 2., Average hours per
day spent in primary activities (1) for the total population and for persons
reporting the activity on the diary day by activity category and weekdays and
weekends, 2004 annual averages, www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t02.htm,
(accessed February 20, 2006)
[7] Council of Economic Advisors Report, 1999,
Note: The estimate of a 22 hour decline between 1969 and 1999 in parental time
in caring for children was arrived by subtracting increased employment hours of
parents from total waking hours. This approach has been questioned by some
sociologists but for the purposes of demonstrating that increased time at work
obviously results in reduced time with family I believe it makes the point.,
quoted from: www.ccpr.ucla.edu/docs/Bianchi%20article.pdf, (accessed February
20, 2006)
[8] Analysis:
Religion, Family, and the General Social Survey, October 19, 2005, Episode
no. 908, available online at: www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week908/analysis1.html
(accessed February 22, 2006)
[9] This
statement is adapted from the How Shall
We Live? video series by Francis
Schaeffer.
[10] Blaise
Pascal, Pascal’s Pensées, (New York: Pantheon Books, 1965), p. 107
[12] Barry
Schwartz, Paradox of Choice: Why More is
Less (:
Harper Perennial, January 1, 2005)
[13] David
G. Myers, PhD, American Psychologist
Magazine (Vol. 55, No. 1)
[14]
Vaverek,
Catholic Worker
[16]
Vaverek,
Catholic Worker
[17] Michael
Medved, taken from a lecture delivered on March 9, 2005, on the Hillsdale
College campus and printed in the May 2005 Imprimis
newsletter.
[18] George Barna, Evangelicals Are the Most Generous
Givers, but Fewer than 10% of Born Again Christians Give 10% to Their Church, April
5, 2000,
www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=52
(accessed February 22, 2006) Barna reports
that the median amount of money given to
non-profits and churches by the typical adult last year was $300. That is a 14%
decline from 1998 levels ($350 median per person). Even more telling was
the decline in the mean total gift amount. The average for 1999 was $1045 per
adult. That represents a 24% decline from 1998, when the average cumulative
giving was $1377.
[21] Holy
Bible, Philippians 2:6-8, New
International Version
[22]
Vaverek,
Catholic Worker
[23] G.K.
Chesterton, What’s Wrong With the World,
(San Francisco: Ignatius Press, April 1, 1994) p. 37
|
 |